Ajai Shukla / Mazagon Dock Ltd, Mumbai Mar 30, 2009, 23:49 IST
The Indian Navy’s firepower is going to be significantly boosted with the addition of four heavy warships. The navy’s design chief, Rear Admiral MK Badhwar, has confirmed for the first time, to Business Standard, that the Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) — the top procurement body in the Ministry of Defence (MoD) — has cleared Project 15-B, the construction of four 6800-tonne destroyers by Mazagon Dock Ltd, Mumbai (MDL).
There was no competitive bidding for Project 15-B, since MDL is the only Indian shipyard large enough to build destroyers, which are significantly larger than frigates. MDL is currently completing Project 15-A, the construction of three destroyers of the Kolkata Class; Project 15-B (the class has not been named yet) is a “follow-on project”, i.e. it is only incrementally different from Project 15-A.
Asked when manufacture will begin, Admiral Badhwar said, “The Indian Navy has asked MDL for a quotation. Once that is received, an MoD Contract Negotiation Committee (CNC) will negotiate a price with MDL for the four destroyers. After the price is agreed upon, the MoD will accord final sanction for the project.”
The navy intends to drive a hard bargain with MDL. Admiral Badhwar explains, “The three Kolkata class destroyers built under Project 15-A cost about Rs 3800 crore each, i.e. about Rs 11,000 crore. Project 15-B should logically be cheaper.”
At that price, Project 15-B will save more than a billion dollars per warship. Australia bought its F100 frigates (at 3,000 tonne, significantly smaller and more lightly armed than the destroyers that will be built under Project 15-B) from Spanish shipyard, Navantia, for the equivalent of Rs 9,000 crore per frigate.
Crucial to how cheaply, and how fast, Project 15-B can be built is the issue of how different these warships will be from their predecessors in the Kolkata Class Project 15-A. Project 15-A has taken longer than anticipated because it incorporated significant changes and upgrades from its predecessor, Project 15 (three Delhi Class destroyers). But Project 15-B, MDL hopes, will have fewer design challenges; it will differ from its predecessor only in weaponry and sensors.
Vice Admiral HS Malhi, chairman and managing director (CMD) of MDL explains, “If there are no major changes in Project 15-B, we can definitely cut down the build time. If the vendors can use the same manufacturing equipment, if the same drawings can be used, it makes a big difference. Standardisation is the key.”
Admiral Malhi points, as an example, to the US Navy’s DDG-51 programme, in which 62 destroyers have already been churned out with standardised hulls and propulsion systems.
MDL’s CMD points out, “If you have that kind of production line, the speed of building and the cost of building comes down dramatically.”
This is the Catch-22 situation facing Indian warship-building. The shipyards want larger orders of warships with standardised designs. But the Indian Navy has tended to place smaller orders of 3-4 ships; the navy says construction delays by the shipyards mean that designs get outdated by the time the ships are rolled out.
This impasse, however, appears to be dissolving. The design similarities between Projects 15-A (three destroyers) and 15-B (four destroyers) could effectively combine those into a combined seven-destroyer order. Similarly, Project 17-A is being planned as an order for seven stealth frigates.
MDL believes that, since Project 15-B is a follow on of the 15-A, the design and planning period will be less than 1½ years. Once the design is finalised, the navy wants the first destroyer to roll out within four years, with the others completed at one-year intervals. By that ambitious timeline, if the order is placed on MDL by end-2009, the first 15-B destroyer would be commissioned in mid-2015.
This is rubbish. These 4 will emerge as replacements for the delhi-class. What happened to fleet enlargement? it doesnt look like the navy intends to do it.
MDL as the only shipyard? another bad joke, just the navy asserting its suspicion of non-navy controlled shipyards. Cochin is bigger, Vizag will be biggest in 2-3 yrs.
Finally, 4 doesnt cut it. Numbers are important, esp considering chinese naval expansion.
4 nos is too small for India , need to place more nos , we should also allow private sector to build ships .
We need to place more large no orders for Submarines, should have a policy to build atleast or should maintain 40 nos fleet to secure India .To avoid monopoly / reduce time waste , Without allowing private sector in india nothing will be fulfilled in defense .
Well, talking about competitive bidding, Cochin Shipyard can build bigger ships than MDL which is why the IAC is being built there... so take second guesses.
Posted by: wearyman
April 04 , 2009, 13:57 IST
This is rubbish. These will emerge as replacements for the delhi-class by 2020, what happened to fleet enlargement?
MDL as only capable docks? just reasserting the navy's refusal to give contracts to non-navy controlled shipyards.
outdated designs? as far as I know no navy ship is at the cutting edge, their all old and outdated, design bureau's don't possess the know-how to make a 'latest' design.
4 just doesn't cut it. Numbers are important, esp in light if chinese naval expansion.
Content Guide
